subj = 97 year old woman arrested in Texas
So a 97 year old woman was arrested for non-payment of a moving violation and driving an unregistered vehicle. Now while I'd agree that handcuffing the legally handicapped and cane walking woman was a bit overboard and likely unnecessary, the arrest is definitely meritted. You can't reasonably contend that had this violation been perpetrated by a youth or middle aged person that this commotion would reach anywhere near the national attention it has. But, from the perspective of treating all citizens equally, could they really 'not' have arrested this woman. As I said, maybe they could have spared her the handcuffs, but arresting her was well justified and necessary to preserve equal protection and treatment under the laws we live by. Anyone who thinks differently should simply think on how they'd view the situation if the woman were 40 instead of 90 would you give her so much leeway?
So a 97 year old woman was arrested for non-payment of a moving violation and driving an unregistered vehicle. Now while I'd agree that handcuffing the legally handicapped and cane walking woman was a bit overboard and likely unnecessary, the arrest is definitely meritted. You can't reasonably contend that had this violation been perpetrated by a youth or middle aged person that this commotion would reach anywhere near the national attention it has. But, from the perspective of treating all citizens equally, could they really 'not' have arrested this woman. As I said, maybe they could have spared her the handcuffs, but arresting her was well justified and necessary to preserve equal protection and treatment under the laws we live by. Anyone who thinks differently should simply think on how they'd view the situation if the woman were 40 instead of 90 would you give her so much leeway?